Justice in the AI era is not just about catching criminals—it’s about ensuring fairness, accountability, and safeguarding civil liberties

Abstract

Inside the criminal justice systems, the collective use of technology along with the sectors – law enforcement, the legal system, and correctional institutions, have a significant impact. In this series, one can find out how to navigate the space – involvement of body cameras, surveillance technology and artificial intelligence (AI) – changing the way mainstream criminal justice system operates in India. It examines the positive aspects and disadvantage, primarily their capacity to engender efficiency, accountability and transparency. It takes into account the privacy, the consequences of algorithmic bias and the Digital Divide of introducing technology in the social, ethical and legal landscape of crime and justice. The paper is concluded by suggestions on an egalitarian and suitable integration of information technology in India’s judicial administration.

Introduction

The potential applications for this kind of technology innovation are higher security, efficiency transparency, and law enforcement accountability and judicial processes. While there is a widespread use due to which there comes, a large numbers of    societal, legal and ethical challenges, especially the issues of privacy, bias and exploitation. This paper examines the multifarious impact of technology on India criminal justice system, specifically artificial intelligence (AI), surveillance and body cameras. It offers a hint toward the way of rightfully and sensibly implementing these technologies once you know what they have to offer.

The Impact of AI on the Criminal Justice System

Artificial intelligence has become one of the essential tools that police forces around the world have turned to in recent years, as predictive policing has received more credibility.[1] Through the application of machine learning algorithms, predictive policing could examine previous crime events to recognize several trends which can guide judgement about whence resources go within law enforcement office.[2] Maharashtra is one of the large number of Indian States which have opted for Predictive Police Tech to forecast future crime palms and pre-emptive action. This approach has been shown to reduce crime lows, but worry about algorithmic bias and over policing exists in those communities.[3]

Utilization of the Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial Services

Judicial system is encountering greater use of AI in such areas as case management, legal research and adjudication. Now under e-Courts program of India, AI is integrated in Indian judiciary system to automate some of the routine process such as the case scheduling, document management and legal research.[4] AI based systems can analyze legal texts, precedents and case laws and may provide judges and lawyers with important insights in order to their judgement. [5]

Sentencing is the area where most AI implementation in the legal system seen. Judiciary get data-driven judicial proposals AI architectures following the evaluation of case efficacy, myriad criminal history, and every alternate definite things. It also raises ethical problems with AI in judicial decision-making, although there’s great potential it could help bring uniformity and fairness to sentencing outcomes.[6] Opponents of AI in sentencing suggest that it could result in cold and lacking in compassion judgments from the courts, that are immune to the feelings and struggles of people. [7]

The Ethical and Legal Challenges of AI in the Criminal Justice System

Many legal and ethical problems arise from the potential employment of AI in the criminal justice system. One of the main concerns for bias in algorithms exists. Bias in AI outcomes may affect groups, which are otherwise unconnected, or may be disadvantaged by those who incorporate prejudiced data into its training. This would be a perverse danger of further polarising the criminal justice system and undermining of public faith in the police and the courts.[8]

The black box goodness is a major hurdle. As a result of the opaqueness of many AI systems – sometimes referred to as “black boxes” – it is not always clear to foresee the rationale behind them. of situations in which the outcomes are unjust or discriminatory, they may be unable to consider AI systems accountable because of a lack of transparency.[9]

To mitigate these challenges, a criminal justice framework of particular beliefs and established regulation that refers to artificial intelligence is required. This guidelines aim to provide assurance that AI system are biased free, transparent, accountable. To ensure, as quickly as possible, AI disasters to be solved, they must be constant and evaluated as well as monitored.[10]

The Utilization of Surveillance Systems by Criminal Justice Agencies

Drones, facial scan technology, and some sort of security video cameras are essential tools associated with modern law enforcement as well as crime deterrence. The large scale foray of closed-circuit video cameras in public areas of India have served as an adequate deterrent against illicit activities besides helping gather crucial evidences for the courts. To be secure in public, read the following as Jharkhand and Himachal Pradesh with surveillance systems have used facial recognition, predictive analytics. [11]

Drones are a popular tool for law enforcement, above all out of necessity – checking areas that are too big to reach or too inaccessible. Drones carrying race physics facial recognition tabs can recognize and track rings of possible visitors in chamber time. But lots of privacy concerns arise from utilizing drones for monitoring particularly pertaining to possible abuses and lawful void.[12]

The Concerns of Privacy and Ethics

The deployment of surveillance technology within the criminal justice sector causes considerable anonymity and etiquette problems.[13] If surveillance data, and to a greater extent, the information collected through usage of surveillance cameras and drones may cause general surveillance beyond today, potentially a limit on personal rights by imposing privacy loss to the public from scofflaw logically, it seems there may be more surveillance than there should be by aspects of why surveillance and invasive information collection as conducting injury and access by specific parties when it is illegal or unjust. Misuse is a major concern, especially when such technologies are employed to monitor vulnerable groups, political activists and minorities.[14]

There ought to be clear laws and regulations as to the use of the monitoring technologies to ease the minds of their users. Adequate protection of personal privacy needs to be built by these standards so that the monitoring can be done legally and properly.[15] To prevent that surveillance technologies are misused, autonomous control mechanisms should be created to monitor their use.[16]

India’s Structure for Legally Supervised Activities

The Information Technology Act 2000 and the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 are two Act which provide for legal framework for surveillance in India. These laws permit the taking of electronic evidence and the interception of communications. On the other hand, it is argued that available legal rules are insufficient with regard to addressing the developments involved in surveillance technologies.

Another important Indian judiciary body that has shaped surveillance law provisional is the Supreme Court. People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. the Union of India[17], (1996), the Supreme Court put in place entitlements for lawful interception of communications. Union of India*, to require clarity, accountability, and rationality. Regardless, however, broad statutes are still needed to deal with the ethical and legal questions arising from contemporary monitoring devices.

Utilization of Body-Worn Cameras by Law Enforcement Personnel

The value of the body-worn cameras (BWC) has grown in the eyes of the enhancing accountability and knowability within the police.[18] Police officers could give a fairer description of incidents by using devices to record their dealing with the public. Delhi, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu are the Indian states which have begun BWC pilot initiatives to see efficiencies that possess police openness along with public trust.[19]

One of the main benefits of BWCs is the capacity of BWCs to furnish crucial evidence in investigations. The sense of justice and accountability may be heightened from resolved and correct cases sooner.[20]

Challenges and Ethical Concerns

Although BWC offers a variety of benefits, using it is not problem free and encounters a number of tough moral controversies. Video evidence is one of the biggest challenges body-worn cameras pose as there is a huge amount of data to manage and store.[21] When the evidence presented before the court is this footage then it makes it usurious that the details of the data must me safe and un-tampered.[22]

The major obstacle to BWC implementation is concerns of privacy. In cases like family problems or because openness with vulnerable individuals, continued taping could sound a quantity damage on a number of people’s exclusive rights. To tackle these issues it is necessary to adopt a clear set of protocols on the activation of BWCs as well as further rules to govern their use.[23]

Indian Legislation and Policy Concerning Biological Weapons Conventions

A complete legal and regulatory framework is the need for the time being of India to monitor the usage of BWCs as their implementation is still in the inception. In the implementation and enforcement of BWC provisions, there is a flaw due to the lack of existing law. Because of this problem, it becomes necessary to fix laws and regulations freely in order to ensure responsibly all usage of BWC’s yet one time refusing misuse also private rights of foreigners.[24]

Conclusion and Recommendations

It is believed that technology can make the Indian criminal justice system more accountable, transparent, and efficient. Privacy issues, bias and the chance for exploitation are three areas where it raises substantial challenges. It is critical to have a thorough and systematic method in order to make the most of technology in meeting these issues.

To actualize technology adoption in the criminal justice system, it would need to try out investing in it. This consists of providing judicial and law enforcement bodies with appropriate software and hardware, upgrading digital networks and guaranteeing steady internet access. For Digital systems to be made safe and protected from any sensitive legal Information there must be a strong law of Cyber securities system.

Laws of today have to be updated with the pace techno is moving. This articulates in amending to BNSS, BNS, IT Act and related Acts to provide for rules for admissibility of digital admissible, using of Artifical Intelligence (AI) in Judicial Process and regulation mechanisms. The collection, holding and use of private data must be liable to a wide-ranging information security regulation which strike a proper stability between the needs of law and order and of privacy and security.

In order to guarantee the effective use of new technology, training programs for all stakeholders such as judges, lawyers, police officers, etc. should be undertaken. The main areas of instruction for these courses should be data management, cybersecurity, and ethics of computing.

All segments of society shall be able to benefit from the progress of technological development. To achieve this goal, we need to establish user-focussed digital platforms that cater for a wide user base and ensure those residing in rural and remote areas have access to affordable and reliable internet. Guaranteeing that the people with disabilities have equal access to legal services and that digital platforms are accessible to them are very much important.

To spot problems, evaluate the effect of technology on legal results, and improve performance, procedures need to accumulate ongoing surveillance and assessment of technological initiatives. Beyond the desire to leverage digital : For any digital initiatives and to be sure that they benefit everyone, there need to be feedback, specifically from stakeholders.

To see a final plan on technological integration, all sorts of agencies should collaborate, including judiciaries, law enforcement, telecommunications industry, and legislatures. Regular communication and cooperation may enable the creation of integrated solutions and exchange of best practices. India may be to advantage from the application of tried and tested methods and technologies through foreign aid, and that these, in turn, will make accessible to innovative technological solutions and progression.

Finally, there is no one sweep solution to the infrastructural, legal, ethical, and inclusivity challenges that exist to prevent technology in India’s criminal justice system to be integrating wholly. India may establish a more efficient, transparent and fair criminal justice system supported by technology, but only when India prioritizes the investment in the infrastructure, upgrade legal framework, enhance digital literacy, accessibility, continuous programme evaluation and partnership. By adopting these codes, we may prevent technology progress is evenly and favourably dealt with all stakeholders.

---

[1] “All You need to know about AI adoption in Criminal Justice,” available at: https://www.techuk.org/resource/all-you-need-to-know-about-ai-adoption-in-criminal-justice.html (last visited March 14, 2025).

[2] “The Implications of AI for Criminal Justice – Council on Criminal Justice,” available at: https://counciloncj.org/the-implications-of-ai-for-criminal-justice/ (last visited March 14, 2025).

[3] “The Growing Role of AI in Criminal Justice – MastersInAI.org,” available at: https://www.mastersinai.org/industries/criminal-justice/ (last visited March 14, 2025).

[4] “Press Release: Press Information Bureau,” available at: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2043476 (last visited March 14, 2025).

[5] “AI and the Rule of Law: Capacity Building for Judicial Systems | UNESCO,” available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/rule-law/mooc-judges (last visited March 14, 2025).

[6] “AI in judicial processes: Transforming India’s legal system,” available at: https://indiaai.gov.in/article/ai-in-judicial-processes-transforming-india-s-legal-system (last visited March 14, 2025).

[7] “Judicial systems are turning to AI to help manage vast quantities of data and expedite case resolution | IBM,” available at: https://www.ibm.com/case-studies/blog/judicial-systems-are-turning-to-ai-to-help-manage-its-vast-quantities-of-data-and-expedite-case-resolution (last visited March 14, 2025).

[8] Rahul Kailas Bharati, “Ethical Implications of AI in Criminal Justice: Balancing Efficiency and Due Process,” 9 RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary 93–105 (2024).

[9] Alexis Morin-Martel, “Machine learning in bail decisions and judges’ trustworthiness,” 39 AI and Society 2033–44 (2024).

[10] Rowena Rodrigues, “Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities,” 4 Journal of Responsible Technology 100005 (2020).

[11] Christopher Slobogin and Sarah Brayne, “Surveillance Technologies and Constitutional Law,” 6 Annual review of criminology 219 (2022).

[12] Sarah Brayne, “The criminal law and law enforcement implications of big data,” 14 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 293–308 (2018).

[13] Daniel J. Power, Ciara Heavin and Yvonne O’Connor, “Balancing privacy rights and surveillance analytics: a decision process guide,” 4 Journal of Business Analytics 155–70 (2021).

[14] Bradley J. Alge, “Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice,” 86 Journal of Applied Psychology 797–804 (2001).

[15] Vincent Charles, Madjid Tavana and Tatiana Gherman, “The right to be forgotten – is privacy sold out in the big data age?,” 7 International Journal of Society Systems Science 283 (2015).

[16] Mark Andrejevic, “Automating surveillance,” 17 Surveillance and Society 7–13 (2019).

[17] AIR 1997 SUPREME COURT 568.

[18] “Research on Body-Worn Cameras and Law Enforcement | National Institute of Justice,” available at: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/research-body-worn-cameras-and-law-enforcement (last visited March 14, 2025).

[19] “Importance of body-worn cameras in law enforcement? Body Worn Camera Supplier in India,” available at: https://www.nordencommunication.com/en-in/blog/importance-body-worn-camera (last visited March 14, 2025).

[20] Cynthia Lum et al., “Body‐worn cameras’ effects on police officers and citizen behavior: A systematic review,” 16 Campbell Systematic Reviews e1112 (2020).

[21] Diana Miranda, “Body-worn cameras ‘on the move’: exploring the contextual, technical and ethical challenges in policing practice,” 32 Policing and Society 18–34 (2022).

[22] Una Foye et al., “Exploring the use of body worn cameras in acute mental health wards: a mixed-method evaluation of a pilot intervention,” 24 BMC Health Services Research 681 (2024).

[23] Una Foye et al., “Implementation of Body Worn Camera: Practical and Ethical Considerations,” 45 Issues in Mental Health Nursing 379–90 (2024).

[24] National Research Council (US) Committee on Scientific Milestones for the Development of a Gene Sequence-Based Classification System for the Oversight of Select Agents, Summary of Relevant Legislation, Regulation, and Guidance (National Academies Press (US), 2010).