“The business of business should not be about money. It should be about responsibility. It should be about public good, not private greed”
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India has moved on from being a charitable endeavor to a statutory compliance under Company Act 2013 in coherence with the evolving global trends of ethical business actions. The paper addresses the legislative, judicial and applied aspects of CSR in India sympathetically located within international parameters. Using historical analysis, legal assimilation, and legal precedents, the study explores CSR’s position in combining corporate liability with social benefits. Tokenism, transparency deficits and regulatory uncertainty’s are set against new trends on the horizon such as alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’s) and emerging technologies. Notable verdicts like the Bhopal Gas Disaster and Sterlite Industries cases demonstrate the court’s function in enforcing environmental as well as social answerability. Through this analysis, the paper explores CSR’s current importance in pursuit for sustainable development in India.
Keywords: CSR, Sustainable Development, Ethical Business
Introduction
The corporate social responsibility, CSR has become the base of the new business ethics, in which economic activity goes hand in hand with social and environmental responsibility. In India, this idea was codified under section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, under which qualifying providers are required to make a contribution of no less than 2% of their income to CSR activities. This Act was a paradigm shift from discretionary charity towards enforceable accountability which put India on a par with global good governance trend. Schedule VII of the Act provides for CSR domains, education, healthcare and environmental sustainability, while the 2014 CSR Rules specify the governance framework, namely CSR committee and reporting. This paper explores legal, ethical and operational aspects of CSR in India; its historical beginnings; comparison of it with foreign models; judgments passed on CSR. Drawing on software of implementation challenges as well as of current innovations, the study highlights CSR’s ability to deal with socio-economic inequalities while assisting India to expand in keeping with global sustainability priorities.
Meaning and Definition of CSR
The notion of CSR is rooted in discursive concept which can be explained in various theoretical frameworks to explain why corporate goes beyond profit maximization.[1] Stakeholder Theory· focuses how enterprises repond the employee, the community and the environment, stability of the business , it rely the address of stakeholders interest. This is the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) concept plus, chasing economic, social and environmental performance—a triad as simple as it is profound in the threeP–Profit, People, Planet—the acronym.[2]
Shared Value Creation moves this argument a step further, encouraging corporations to align their business goals with the social needs in order to produce joint benefits. cultural philosophies like Dharma (ethikal duties) and Seva (service), are the core basic of the CSR activities. The Companies Act, 2013, by carrying out the measurable social impact, turning CSR from mere alms to company responsibility. This legal framework of the business reflects a larger acknowledgement that businesses must to contribute to societal value as the means to sustainably business growth.[3]
The idea of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India has its roots which run deep in the history of philanthropy to structured legal framework. In the ancient times the Indian business community lived the idea of the Dharma, they discharged their social obligations while trading through charity, building temples, public welfare activities. It was institutionalized by industrialists like Jamsetji Tata, G.D. Birla, and others entrepreneurs in colonial time; they give benefits to education by starting schools, health care by establishing hospitals, welfare programs. With the emergence of public sector under taking (PSUs) post independence, CSR received a greater push as they were very responsible towards nation qualitative progress by running social development initiatives. Yet, the era of contemporary CSR started facing the economic liberalisation of the 1990s, who recommended the corporate engagement in social welfare beyond just donating. A major landmark was the enactment of Companies Act, 2013 wherein CSR was made mandatory with large corporates for systematic and accountable social expenditure. Today CSR in India has become a strategic approach on sustainability, innovation and community development, positioning businesses as main partner of the national growth.[4]
Impact of CSR Initiatives
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is aimed at serving not only the company, but a number of parties like government and individuals, by promoting sustainable development and social improvement. For government, CSR programme is important in aiding to solve the socio-economic issue like poverty, healthcare, and education.[5] By working with companies, the government could mobilize additional resources, expertise and innovation to support the public welfare activities. This partnership decreases the financial burden on the state and increases the over all impact of development plan schemes. In addition, CSR initiatives focused on environmental sustainability also help the government in meeting climate targets and promoting green practices and contribute to the long-term national progress.[6]
For businesses, CSR builds up their reputation, loyalty and employee performance. Organisations that actively commit to social activities, develop deeper relationships between consumers and the communities, arouses goodwill and trust. Meanwhile, CSR-oriented lifestyle companies are also able to employ better talent as employees increasingly pick up lying down for companies that prioritize the good ventures and the social impact.[7] From a financial standpoint, CSR investments can generate long-term returns by better operational performance, reduced risks and creation of fresh business opportunities via sustainable business models. On a personal basis, CSR provides to communities a better year of standard of living by means of enhancing access to education, health care, clean water, plus vocational training sources. Employees participating in CSR activities, also gain personal satisfaction and professional development, enhance a culture of compassion and accountability. In simple terms CSR is a ripple effect, it provides society with a positive impact while it drives economic and social growth for all the stakeholders.[8]
Legal Framework Under the Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013 turned the fiscal landscape of CSR in the country on its head by a three-pronged strategy. First, it lays down compliance for entities having specified financial parameters: for that is, entities having net-worth of ₹500 crore, turnover of ₹1,000 crore, net profit of ₹5 crore.[9] It, Second, institutionalises governance by mandating a board-level CSR Committee with the responsibility of designing policies, allocation fund and implementations of projects. Lastchaft, it promotes transparency through comprehesive yearly reports, investments, activities, and impact reviews. Schedule VII of the Act, hence, carves out 12 thematic areas – ranging from elimination of hunger to promotion of renewable energy—keeping in sync, in other words, with National Priorities . Although the Act’s hybrid mode – which squares mandatory expenditure with operating freedom – illustrates built-in contradictions. Lack of severe penalty too renders non-compliance more questionable since board answers are needed. This framework shows India’s efforts in aligning global CSR standards with local socio economic needs though actual accountability still remains a question.
Judicial Pronouncements Shaping CSR Accountability
India judiciary has been chief in redefining CSR as a constitutional and ethical necessity. The 1984 Bhopal Gas Disaster case charted the course when the Supreme Court adopted the “Polluter Pays Principle”, and made Union Carbide accountable for ecological and humanitarian damages. The court’s order to compensate the victims highlighted the role CSR plays in redressing corporate failure. Like wise the 2018 Sterlite Industries, case emphasis on judicial discipline of enforcing environmental conformity. The shutdown of Vedanta’s Tamil Nadu-based copper plant and the resultant ₹ 100 cr remediation order sealed CSR as a means of restorative justice. In the 1996 Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. In the Union of India case, the judiciary has identified industrial pollution with voice for fundamental rights in favouring CSR the sustainable growth. These verdicts showcase the judicial system’s power to reframe CSR from statutory requirement to constitutional duty and fill up corporate accountability.
CSR Implementation: Challenges and Realities
Although the intent under Borrowers is there CSR implementation in India faces institutional challenges.[10] Tokenism usually outshines impact, with “compliance over result effort” – companies prioritizing compliance over considerable interaction. Gross example being one time health camps orsing school donations, while fulfilling reporting, no longer solve systemic healthcare provisioning to school or education inequality.[11] Problems of ‘capacity gap’ also undermine its effectiveness, and especially in rural areas where infrastructure and coordinator of the stakeholder is weak. A study from Maharashtra in 2020 found that 40% of CSR projects failed on account of, lack of participation from the community and poor administrative handling. Another obstacle is transparency, given that although the National CSR Portal monitors expenditures, project outcomes data is missing in depth, and transparency of the Company is obscured. Regulatory uncertainties add to these challenges – the Act’s non-penal measure for underspending has led to only 55% of eligible companies reaching the 2% target in FY 2022-23. The 2021 amendment requiring impact assessments attempt to address these shortcomings but is met with stares and complaining of SMEs saying SMEs compliance burdens.[12]
Global Perspectives and Comparative Insights
India’s CSR model is perhaps inspired by, yet is in contrast to, the international systems. In United Kingdom Voluntary CSR focus’s charity initiatives like Business in the Community (BITC), Partnerships public-private classifications social impact. In contrast, while India can specify mandatory spending budget, instead, UK’s Companies Act 2006 talks about transparency wherein you are obligated to report sustainability reporting without budgetary limits.[13] Germany’s CSR focus is on stakeholder cooperation and environmental stringency, epitomised by the German Sustainability Code, that requires non-financial reporting. Also India’s Schedule VII follows Germany’s thematic approach but does not have corresponding compliance mechanisms.[14] In the US, the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA) compels the accountability of corporations over human rights breach globally, like the script inside India’s domestic malpractice immunization. However, extraterritorial accountability is in a nascent state in India. These contrasts illustrate India’s one-of-a-kind mixture of prescriptive compliance requirements and aspirational objectives, in line with its development environment but badly in вrien.[15]
Emerging Trends in CSR
Indian contemporary CSR practices show its adaptability towards global as well as local compulsions. With increasing focus on SDG alignment, more than sixty percent of companies are allocating CSR funds to targets like Quality Education (SDG 4) and Clean Water (SDG 6). Take Tata Group’s ‘Project Aakanksha’, for instance, which trains 100,000 girlfriends every year.[16] Technology integration is another important shift here – companies like Infosys uses AI powered platforms that track real-time CSR outcomes while investments in rural digital literacy has been taken up by the “Digital India” drive.[17] Volunteer programs for employees, as with Mahindra & Mahindra’s paid community engagement, boost employee satisfaction and talent-build. At the same time, the circular economy model that is increasingly coming into shape with companies such as ITC stepping in with waste-to-wealth projects. These trends mark a shift from a charity-led approach to changemaking to a strategic, innovation-based approach that can generate big impact at scale.[18]
Case Studies: CSR in Action
- Ganga Pollution Case: This is the matter pertaining to judicial pronouncements to address the pollution and degradation of holy river Ganges in India. The case was aimed at protecting and preserving the holy river which was severely polluted by industrial and domestic activities. Intervened judge, orders to companies and municipalities to prevent pollution, pushing installations wastewater treatment plants, and implementing compliance environment of requirements restore the health of the Ganges River.[19]
- The recent case of M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India[20] was a precedent case that dealt with conservation of environment and suitability of the environmental legislation. It dealt with a number of issues, including control in the industry, preventing pollution, and the need for environmental impact assessments. The case highlighted the role of the court in the defense of environmental rights and promotion of sustainable development.
- “Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India”[21] : This case was about pollution caused by industrial plants in Vellore, Tamil Nadu. The Supreme Court of India discussed the topic of Pollution Control measures and ruled that the companies have to be stringently in bounds of the environmental standards and should take all necessary precautions so as not to let them pollute. The lawsuit campaigned for the corportate responsibilities of environmental norm protection and public health preservation.
- “Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v State of U.P.” : This case was a pioneering case of conservation of the Himalayan region of the state of Uttar Pradesh. The lawsuit was about things such as deforestation, mining and damage to the environment of the region. [22]It resulted in engagement historic verdicts recognizing the rights of the people at local level also the need of sustainability in the area of environmentally sensitive.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in the case of M/s. Hira Power and Steels Limited said that only after finalising the financial statements at the end of the financial year the exact amount of corporate social responsibility (CSR) liability will come out. Hence the declaration of the amount of charitable donation made as corporate social responsibility (CSR) is only after the closure of the financial year financial statements can be informed to the relevant bodies.
These cases illustrate the whole spectrum environmental & corporate law and rights cases in india and underscore the need for legal could to address environmental issues, protect the rights of people and promote sustainable development.
The Road Ahead: Addressing Implementation Gaps
To unleash CSR’s full power, stakeholders have to adopt robust monitoring systems, for example timely audits and real-time dashboards, in order to increase transparence. Collaborative models based on Germany’s csr “networks” could bring together resources and expertise in public-private partnerships. Equal importance needs to be given to localizing strategies—Ultratech Cement’s water conservation projects in water-scarce regions highlight how locally applicable interventions lead to sustainable outcomes. Moreover, there is a cultural shift to carry out so that ethical capitalism was the way a business or organization sees CSR as essential rather than being a regulatory burden. Even though legislative architecture provides the base, the future CSR in India it is amongst the policy implementation ground execution closing barricading through innovate, collaborate and stakeholder inclusivity
Conclusion
Corporate Social Responsibility in India has gone from a moral obligation into a defined legal requirement as is Paris to declare ethical capitalism. The Companies Act 2013 & its allied rules formalized CSR, as CSR has been integrated into the corporate governance through spending pretend, thematic priory & reporting replicas. But despite the discussions, obstacles such as tokenism, opportunities for abuse of transparency and unclear regulations continue to put in doubt demands for transformative power of CSR. The gap between policy intent and implementation on ground is wide, with wide range of companies seeing CSR as a compliance exercise rather than a core business strategy. Emerging trends—SDG alignment, tech-based monitoring and circular economy business models—promise progress but need to scale up.
India’s CSR story is a microcosm for India’s entire development paradox: progressive law and, its implementation lag. If CSR is to bring about sustainable impact, it has to go beyond box-ticking and get to innovation, inclusivity, accountability.
Suggestions for Strengthening CSR in India
Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India needs a more strategic and meaningful program than just meeting legal duets. Companies should link their CSR initiatives to national development priorities , eg poverty reduction education health and environment. In order to work more effectively, companies need to shift from a charity base approach to a sustainable development approach, incorporate CSR in its core business strategy. Cooperation with NGOs, Government Agencies, and local communities can do CSR projects well guided and able to give the measurable long term results. Moreover, businesses should establish open communication systems and conducting independent auditing to measure the actual effect of its undertakings.
Another important component of building CSR is the use of technology and innovation for social transformation. Digital tools, AI and data analytics can help to identify key social challenges, monitor the progress, and allocate resources in the most effective way. Engaging employees in CSR projects is likely to create corporate social responsibility culture in companies. In addition, policy support and financial benefits need to be extended to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in order to entice them to undertake CSR. The government also can revisit CSR rules to spur innovation, providing that companies have the flexibility to create meaningful programs as opposed to only checking a regulatory box. A structured CSR framework can do wonders to India’s socio-economic development beside inculcating responsible and ethical business practices.
[1] Hart O. Awa, Willie Etim and Enyinda Ogbonda, “Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),” 9 International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 2024 9:1 1–14 (2024).
[2] Archie B. Carroll, “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance,” 4 Academy of Management Review 497–505 (1979).
[3] Archie B. Carroll, “Social issues in management research: Experts’ views, analysis and commentary,” 33 Business and Society 5–29 (1994).
[4] Victoria Bush, Alan J. Bush and Linda Orr, “Monitoring the ethical use of sales technology: An exploratory field investigation,” 95 Journal of Business Ethics 239–57 (2010).
[5] Asan Vernyuy Wirba, “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of Government in promoting CSR,” 15 Journal of the Knowledge Economy 7428–54 (2024).
[6] Laura Albareda, Josep M. Lozano and Tamyko Ysa, “Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe,” 74 Journal of Business Ethics 391–407 (2007).
[7] Archie B. Carroll, “Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct,” 38 Business and Society 268–95 (1999).
[8] Laura Albareda et al., “The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: drivers and responses,” 17 Business Ethics: A European Review 347–63 (2008).
[9] “Corporate Social Responsibility Under Section 135 of Companies Act 2013,” available at: https://cleartax.in/s/corporate-social-responsibility (last visited March 14, 2025).
[10] “What are the challenges of CSR for companies?,” available at: https://www.esce.fr/en/faq-all-the-answers-to-your-questions/what-are-the-challenges-of-csr-for-companies/ (last visited March 14, 2025).
[11] “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Challenges and Resolutions – CyberSWIFT,” available at: https://www.cyberswift.com/blog/csr-challenges-and-resolutions/ (last visited March 14, 2025).
[12] Avadh Bihari and P. K. Shajahan, “Why Are Social Work Professionals Relevant in Corporate Social Responsibility? A Case of CSR and Non-CSR Projects in India” The International Journal of Community and Social Development (2024).
[13] “(PDF) CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: A REVIEW AT INDIAN AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE,” available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369913050_CORPORATE_SOCIAL_RESPONSIBILITY_A_REVIEW_AT_INDIAN_AND_GLOBAL_PERSPECTIVE (last visited March 14, 2025).
[14] Susan Ariel Aaronson, “Corporate Responsibility in the Global Village: The British Role Model and the American Laggard,” 108 Business and Society Review 309–38 (2003).
[15] “‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility on JSTOR,” available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159405 (last visited March 14, 2025).
[16] “CSR in India: Sector-Wise Allocation, Trends & Challenges (2024),” available at: https://proteantech.in/articles/current-sector-wise-allocation-in-csr-05112024/ (last visited March 14, 2025).
[17] Sanjai Bhatt et al., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Development in India: An Interface,” 44 Social Development Issues (2023).
[18] Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Dr. Asma Farooque and Dr. Syed Afzal Ahmad, “Corporate Social Responsibility in India: A Review of Corporate Contributions to Sustainable Development Goals” Educational Administration Theory and Practices (2024).
[19] D. C. Jhariya and Anoop Kumar Tiwari, “Ganga River: A Paradox of Purity and Pollution in India due to Unethical Practice,” 597 IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (2020).
[20] AIR 1987 SUPREME COURT 1086.
[21] AIR 1996 SUPREME COURT 2715.
[22] 1985 SCR (3) 169.
